|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are 'safe havens' laws and programs a knee-jerk reaction to the problem of abandoned babies or a well thought-out plan? Read differing views and a summary of laws and programs in operation around the U.S.
Continue reading Legalized Abandonment - How Widespread in the Problem? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like this option versus leaving a child in a toilet, dumpster, or garbage can, but it is very sad that states even have to set a precedent for this. People should take responsibility for their own actions. These women need regular prenatal care so that this child can be as healthy as possible. Chances are that most of these abandoned children have not had that. These women also need counseling. This just seems like it is covering up the problem rather than making the woman face it head on. The child deserves to know where it came from and its medical history. Legalized abandonment may save the child's life, but what emotional problems will it create down the road for the mother and the child?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If we are willing to take on a baby without identifying information, then why not provide counseling at the drop-off place in an anonymous fashion? That way, at least some information could be gathered about drug history, family medical issues, etc. And recommendations can be made to the mother for her own ongoing care.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with you completely Alchemy, but I guess the powers-that-be think that would discourage women from using the safe haven versus other places. I personally think that it is a good idea though.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|