Inside Out: Foster Care Reform - Documented Abuses
Part 2: Documented Abuses The basic question is: why are we removing any children, when foster care-related child neglect and abuse are being reported from all over the country? Each day we read in some newspaper of yet anotherinvestigation of child abuse in foster care.
A recent
TIME Magazine article references a troubling report commissionedby the Reagan Administration in the late 1980s, which concluded:
"Foster care is intended to protect children from neglect and abuse at the hands of parents and other family members, yet all too often it becomes anequally cruel form of neglect and abuse by the state."
In California, two Grand Juries in San Diego County would echo these concerns, concluding:
"Professionals working in the field of child abuse voiced strong concerns that the children removed from abusive homes werebeing abused again by a system designed to protect them."
A Santa Clara County Grand Jury would reach a similar conclusion, having determined that children often face greater risks in its existing foster care program than they do in their own homes:
"Sometimes, foster care placements are made that are just as abusive, if notmore so, than the home from which the child was removed. The Grand Jurylearned of placements where sexual and physical abuse took place. There waseven a case where the infant died."
In Washington State, a Governor's blue-ribbon task force concluded:
"The effect of our present foster care system is disastrous. Children are moved from one foster home to another, their school attendance is disruptedand health care needs often go unmet. They are sometimes exposed to abuse by other children in care."
Elsewhere, a report by the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services determined that the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
"has no assurance that the quality ofcare being given to foster children placed by child-placing agencies wasadequate." Federal reviewers found "many cases" of children "in potentiallyharmful situations."
- At least one fire or health deficiency was found in 40of the 48 homes reviewed.
- In 28 of the 48 homes, no record could be found toprove that required criminal background checks had been made.
- The reportdescribed some foster homes as filled with trash.
Next page >
Poor Outcomes > Page
1, 2,
3,
4
Home
Comments
Of course there are people who go into it with good intentions. And of course people get overwhelmed and don't know how to tell the caseworkers. Even parents with natural children get overwhelmed! The thing to remember is that these children deserve a loving home where they feel safe and secure. Foster care needs to pay more so that they can be more discriminating in choosing who they allow to be foster parents. There should be more training and help for these people who take children into their homes. Caseworkers should not have as many cases as they have. The whole system needs to be reformed, but will it be? Probably not!
Posted by: cranium at 11/23/2005 02:31 PM
Even among people who undertake foster care to "make money" as you say, I believe there are people whose intentions are good. If we believe that people should do what they're passionate about to earn a living, we should not judge people for that if their passion is caring for kids.
I think the problem comes because many people are in over their heads. They don't have the skills (and often don't even realize they don't have them) to deal with grieving children, and yet they don't feel they can say, "I'm in over my head." Some people take on too many children because they feel sorry for them, which spikes the stress level in the home.
If foster parenting really paid what it was worth, you'd have a larger pool of applicants to do it. You could insist on intense training, with people earning genuine certification after internships, etc. That's the degree of reform that would have to happen to really make a difference in the quality of foster care.
Posted by: FineLineWriter at 11/19/2005 03:04 PM
It is a very sad commentary on the country in general that children are abused by the very people that are supposed to be taking care of them because of abuse by their parents. There needs to be reform in foster care, but it needs to be completed carefully and thoughtfully. There are families that are doing foster care just to make some money because they are too lazy to work, but there are also loving families that take children into their home because they want to help. There needs to be some sort of system set up to make sure that abuse becomes a rare occurence instead of a regular occurence. Otherwise, we are setting these children up for some major problems down the road.
Posted by: jmrodg at 11/15/2005 03:18 PM
I had the honor of working in a family preservation program for 6 months (before changes in the way that work was funded shut the program down). Our whole premise was that if you can build on a family's strengths and keep children safe with their own families, they will almost always be better off than they are in foster care. While we were unable to prevent all children from being taken into (state) custody, due to their parents' and sometimes their own choices, we were able to help a lot of families stay together and improve their day-to-day functioning. Yet for some reason, efforts to improve life for children rarely come while they're still young and with their families. That's especially sad, since when they're older it becomes so much harder to place them elsewhere.
Posted by: alchemy at 11/14/2005 12:31 PM
I really appreciate this perspective on foster care, particularly because it comes from someone that has lived through a very challenging experience, and clearly also done his research to determine some of the "facts" to go along with the emotional component that he experienced first-hand. While I have certainly known and seen many wonderful, happy foster care stories, there are so many more unhappy ones -- so many that I almost cynically think of a child being placed in foster care as being a nearly guaranteed death sentence for his/her spirit. While I think it's impossible to take away all the emotional trauma that occurs when children bounce around in foster care, it is certainly possible to take away the threat of physical violence and increase the security (at least when it comes to a child being guaranteed a home that is absolutely 100 percent guaranteed to be without violence) of the child's life. Even in transition, a child is absolutely entitled to nurturing and loving people to guide him/her through the challenges of life.
If creating this safety means more man hours spent on investigating prospective foster homes and more regular check-ups, I think that should be the goal.
Posted by: bandstand at 11/13/2005 12:00 PM
View all comments (5)
Add Your Comments!
We want to know what you think. Your comments are important to us and the other readers. You are what makes this site special.