A Few Words on Words in Adoption, Page 4

You may use the stars on the left to rate and leave feedback for the current article. No registration is required. Waiting for 5 votes 0.0 of 5 stars (0 votes) — Thanks for your vote

Please fill out the following optional information before submitting your rating:




How we use words

Unlike most articles on adoption language this one will not end with a little chart that diagrams old and new adoption language. Instead, I will offer you a few questions to hopefully help you think about the meaning of the words used to describe adoption.
  1. Do you or others use the word with a silent, but intended, "only" in front of it? (As in "She is (only) his birthmother." Or "They are (only) his adoptive family.")
  2. Does your language honor the connections that exist? (For example, calling an expectant mother, or an adoptive mother, "mom.") Or do you use qualifying language inappropriately to diminish those connections? (As in "She's not one of their own, she's adopted.")
  3. Does your language reflect the reality of the situation, both legally and practically? For example, Pat Johnston, using RAL, refers to the term "reunion" this way: "While children adopted at an older age may indeed experience a reunion, most adoptees join their families as infants, and as such they have no common store of memories or experience such as are traditionally shared in a reunion." Personally I find this description diminishing of the connections between an adopted person and his or her birth family. We often go to "family reunions" where the connections between people are based on extended family ties and not on a previous extended relationship.
  4. Have you asked others involved how they would like to be addressed or referred to? Many adopted persons I know prefer that term (adopted person) to "adoptee." According to Dr. G. William Troxler, "The term 'adoptee' is a linguistic diminutive intended to keep adopted people servile. That is to say an adoptee is in a position of subservience just as an employee is to an employer or as a lessee is to a lessor." Others see no problem with referring to themselves as adoptees.
  5. Do you continue to use language that others find offensive?
Adoption language that is honorable, respectful, and thoughtful honors all the connections inherent in adoption, whether those connections exist through law, blood, or love.

Comments

[QUOTE=absolutely]You know, if we weren't so attached in our culture to the idea that being #1 is best, or better than 2nd, we could just talk about "my first mother" and "my second mother." Surely, the woman with the power to make the first lifeshaping decision (to allow her child to live with and become part of another family) deserves to be acknowledged as that child's first mother. And really, there is no disrespect to the 2nd mother in that language. I'm my husband's second wife, but no reasonable person would argue that I'm not his "real" wife, nor do I feel diminished by acknowledging his ex as his first wife.[/QUOTE]

I agree with you here. My children say "my first dad" to talk about their birth father. They just naturally began saying this on their own adn I didn't see any reason to correct them. It is the way they see it in their eyes and it makes perfect sense to me as well.

Posted by: chimera at 10/20/2005 11:03 AM

Wow! This article really made me think about what language I and other people that are around me use when talking about adoption. Taking a child into your home is taking everything that makes them who they are-including race, culture, country, etc. You are not only taking just the child but their whole being into your home. I think it is very important to celebrate and learn from their differences. We are all different, even if we are born into the same family, and children that are adopted should know this and be able to embrace it.

Posted by: jmrodg at 10/09/2005 08:26 PM

You're so right! There's definitely a stygma attached to being a "second," "third," "fourth" or any number other than "first" when it comes to anything, even human/family relationships. I think on top of that is the bad connotation of the word that is ever-implied by numbering things beyond "first," which is "replacement," particularly when it comes to adopted children and their adoptive parents. Who wants to be a "replacement" mother or father for a child? Of course, that's not at all how adoptive parents feel about their position, but that idea is often certainly in life's subtext for adopted children, adoptive parents, birth parents or all! It just further emphasizes the need to reform the way we talk and think about adoption and all its issues.

Posted by: astrophysics at 10/09/2005 09:23 AM

You know, if we weren't so attached in our culture to the idea that being #1 is best, or better than 2nd, we could just talk about "my first mother" and "my second mother." Surely, the woman with the power to make the first lifeshaping decision (to allow her child to live with and become part of another family) deserves to be acknowledged as that child's first mother. And really, there is no disrespect to the 2nd mother in that language. I'm my husband's second wife, but no reasonable person would argue that I'm not his "real" wife, nor do I feel diminished by acknowledging his ex as his first wife.

Posted by: absolutely at 10/08/2005 05:06 PM

I think the section heading "It's About Family" really says it all! I think it's exciting and wonderful that we're starting to see more and more families that really reflect the cultural diversity in the United States, and I think that adoption is really helping narrow some very troubling rifts between cultures, races, families and communities. I think it's truly amazing to see those looking to adopt embracing the challenges associated with adopting older children, children that come from a race or culture that is different from their own, and truly being open to changing what might, perhaps "politically incorrectly" differ from what they initially envisioned to be their "ideal" family make-up. I think it's heartening to see that everyone adopting are starting to truly think about how to talk to their prospective or current children and those choosing to give their children to loving families because they cannot provide the best home for them for whatever reason in a way that will be respectful to everyone involved. I think an important part of creating a true "family," regardless of whether it is through adoption or giving birth, is open and honest communication, and to start out that way from the very beginning is critical. This communication begins often before the child is even born when prospective adoptive parents can set the stage for communicating about adoption terminology with the biological parents of the child. This type of true loving communication spreads, and can truly start to create understanding and love among all members of even the most differently-structured families.

Posted by: astrophysics at 10/05/2005 06:04 PM

View all comments (9)

Add Your Comments!

We want to know what you think. Your comments are important to us and the other readers. You are what makes this site special.

You must be logged in to comment

You must be registered to post. Register here | Forgot your password?

Click Here to Learn More